<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vendor Evaluations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://QualityManualChat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://QualityManualChat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/</link>
	<description>ISO Quality Manuals, Certification, and Consultant Comments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://QualityManualChat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/comment-page-1/#comment-2990</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualitymanualchat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>Sandeep makes a very good point, that there may be situations where, for example, a janitorial service can directly affect your product quality.  Obviously every company has a different set of circumstances, and in such a case you would definitely want to perform some sort of evaluation for a janitorial vendor in such an environment.  And there could also be security issues if the cleaning people come in late at night and have keys to the building.  So it&#039;s your call, people.  If your janitorial vendor, or your office supplies vendor, etc, don&#039;t affect product quality, and you&#039;re pretty sure your auditor doesn&#039;t have a problem with them not being evaluated, I say it&#039;s OK to exclude them from the vendor evaluation process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandeep makes a very good point, that there may be situations where, for example, a janitorial service can directly affect your product quality.  Obviously every company has a different set of circumstances, and in such a case you would definitely want to perform some sort of evaluation for a janitorial vendor in such an environment.  And there could also be security issues if the cleaning people come in late at night and have keys to the building.  So it&#8217;s your call, people.  If your janitorial vendor, or your office supplies vendor, etc, don&#8217;t affect product quality, and you&#8217;re pretty sure your auditor doesn&#8217;t have a problem with them not being evaluated, I say it&#8217;s OK to exclude them from the vendor evaluation process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://QualityManualChat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/comment-page-1/#comment-2988</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualitymanualchat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/#comment-2988</guid>
		<description>perhaps but that would be a good reason to perform cursory risk analysis about all processes being performed in a facility. You can then narrow down those that would have an impact and act accordingly for vendor evaluation. More often than not I would say that the first poster is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps but that would be a good reason to perform cursory risk analysis about all processes being performed in a facility. You can then narrow down those that would have an impact and act accordingly for vendor evaluation. More often than not I would say that the first poster is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep Patwardhan</title>
		<link>http://QualityManualChat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/comment-page-1/#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Patwardhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualitymanualchat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir,

 I agree with what you say that the vendor evaluation can be justified / required as long as the product/service provided by that vendor is directly going to affect the product quality produced by an organization.  But there can be situations where the unclean ambiance may harm / affect your product quality by say , adultration or infection. It may also affect the work efficiency of the staff, there by directly affecting the product/service theyprovide. 
So in my opinion it will be good to enter the names of the vendors who provide such services in the vendor inspection list</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,</p>
<p> I agree with what you say that the vendor evaluation can be justified / required as long as the product/service provided by that vendor is directly going to affect the product quality produced by an organization.  But there can be situations where the unclean ambiance may harm / affect your product quality by say , adultration or infection. It may also affect the work efficiency of the staff, there by directly affecting the product/service theyprovide.<br />
So in my opinion it will be good to enter the names of the vendors who provide such services in the vendor inspection list</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://QualityManualChat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualitymanualchat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Actually, yes you can get a new auditor.  I&#039;ve only had to do that once in about 15 years, but yes you can ask your registar to send a different auditor.  Or you can change registrars.  I wouldn&#039;t recommend you do this a lot, but you probably shouldn&#039;t have to.  Most auditors are reasonable people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, yes you can get a new auditor.  I&#8217;ve only had to do that once in about 15 years, but yes you can ask your registar to send a different auditor.  Or you can change registrars.  I wouldn&#8217;t recommend you do this a lot, but you probably shouldn&#8217;t have to.  Most auditors are reasonable people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://QualityManualChat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualitymanualchat.com/general-quality-system/vendor-evaluations/42/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t feel otherwise, I agree.  But it hacks me off that, like you said, they don&#039;t think we have anything better to do.  I can&#039;t be chasing every last detail, I have a business to run.  If an auditor wants you do do things like that can you just get a new auditor?
Cathy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t feel otherwise, I agree.  But it hacks me off that, like you said, they don&#8217;t think we have anything better to do.  I can&#8217;t be chasing every last detail, I have a business to run.  If an auditor wants you do do things like that can you just get a new auditor?<br />
Cathy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

